while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
Junction-Guy:
"It seems to me that somewhere in the bible it says that God forgets those in hell, perhaps christians will forget them too. Weird question and what does this have to do with the topic gay marriage."
I don't think that there's a Bible verse that says that God will forget anyone in Hell/Gehenna/Lake of Fire.
The relevancy of my question had to do with your claiming that you profess love for "sinners" (who are "bad"). I was wondering how far reaching that "love" was going to be.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
Junction-Guy:
"The Bible says to hate "what" is bad, it doesn't say hate "who is bad" I don't hate JW's (as a people) but I do hate the Watchtower Society"
Do you love the sinner after they're sent to hell (or annihilated at Armageddon)?
today i attended a one-day assembly in my hometown.
i knew when it came time to read the afternoon expenses that it would be an incredibly high and ridiculous amount that was nowhere near the real expenses for that day.
sure enough, after lunch came the announcement.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
sorry, i know i posted this earlier but i believe the title did not gather enough attention.
i think is a topic worth discussing.. http://www.jw-archive.org/post/127866869178/new-light-the-inspired-word-of-god-can.
Aroq: "All this WT article states is that the Septuagint is the faulty text not the Hebrew scriptures."
But if the New Testament writers are supposed to be writing "inspired" literature why should God allow them to get something wrong?
what is it about some of these self proclaimed "christians" who go seeking persecution when it don't exist?.
we've had a case locally in calgary where the initial reports sounded like the person had a legitimate claim: a bus driver didn't want to drive the bus in a gay pride parade and said he'd resign if they made him and that the local transit company was threatening him to force him to do it.. except it was all invented ... by him !.
they already proactively told him that there was no danger that he would be asked to drive that bus in the parade (i.e.
Dumplin: "I agree Vidiot..."
Naughty doggie, I think you were referring to Village Idiot.
I've only had association with a few Liberal Christians and one too many with Conservative/Fundamentalist Christians but I can tell you that Liberals are more kickback and relaxed than the others who despise them for being such.
This is how high up this mentality is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDE8Fo86W1w&feature=player_detailpage#t=17
Republican U.S. Representative Louie Gohmert.
what is it about some of these self proclaimed "christians" who go seeking persecution when it don't exist?.
we've had a case locally in calgary where the initial reports sounded like the person had a legitimate claim: a bus driver didn't want to drive the bus in a gay pride parade and said he'd resign if they made him and that the local transit company was threatening him to force him to do it.. except it was all invented ... by him !.
they already proactively told him that there was no danger that he would be asked to drive that bus in the parade (i.e.
One thing that needs to be realized is that we are dealing with an issue set forth by Fundamentalist Christians which are a minority of all those who self identify as Christian. Liberal Christians, their Bible notwithstanding, have no dog in this fight. Many of them support Gay rights and some even have Gay clergy.
We are doing the Fundamentalist a favor by calling them "Christians" as if they represent the others who are in the 85% of the US Christian population. Fundamentalists despise them (in private) and refer to them as not "the right type of Christian". They should be referred to as Fundamentalist Christians by everybody else in order to emphasize that they are a minority in this nation. That will dull some of their self righteous halo.
